 |
| Quantity: | |
|---|---|
Ningbo, China
USD28 - USD 50
100 bottles
L/C, T/T
11.3KG Disposable Cylinder or Others
2.2
50% of R32 and 50% of R125
75-10-5 & 354-33-6
3163
R410a Refrigerant Gas Introduction, Comparison of R410a and R32
| 11.3KG R410A | Certification：CE | ||||
 | Cylinder | Height | Diameter | Thickness | |
| 420mm | 241mm | 1.5mm | |||
| Material | Capacity | Weight | |||
| DC04 | 13.3L | 3.5kg | |||
| Working Pressure | Testing Pressure | Filling Gas | |||
| 2.8Mpa | 3.45Mpa | R410A/R32 | |||
| Gas Purity | 99.91%-99.97% | ||||
| Gas N.W. | 11.3KG/25lb | ||||
| Packing | carton size 24.5*24.5*42.5cm | ||||
| Packing, Payment and Delivery | |||||
| Packing | 1 cylinder/carton, disposable cylinder, OEM design on carton | ||||
| Loading | 1150 cylinders/20ft container, mixing with other refrigerant gas is supported | ||||
| Payment | Normally By T/T 30% as deposit, and the 70% balance against copy of B/L | ||||
| Delivery | within 20 days after receipt of deposit and confirm of carton design | ||||
 | |||||
Comparative analysis of the characteristics of R410A and R32.
1. Thermophysical properties: R32 charging volume can be reduced, only 0.71 times that of R410A. The working pressure of R32 system is higher than R410A, but the maximum increase is not more than 2.6%, which is equivalent to the pressure requirement of R410A system, and R32 system exhausts Compared with R410A, the temperature rises up to 35.3℃.
2. Environmental protection characteristics: ODP value (ozone depletion potential value) is 0, but R32's GWP value (global warming potential value) is moderate, compared with R22, the CO2 emission reduction ratio can reach 77.6%, while R410A is only 2.5% , It is significantly better than R410A in terms of CO2 emission reduction.
3. Safety: Both R32 and R410A are non-toxic, while R32 is combustible. Among several alternatives to R22, R32 and R290, R32 has the highest lower combustion limit, LFL. Although R290 is the most environmentally friendly, it is highly flammable and has a safety level of A3. Therefore, it is required to only charge air conditioners within 2p, and large number air conditioners are restricted.
4. Cycle performance: In terms of theoretical cycle performance, the cooling capacity of the R32 system is 12.6% higher than that of R410A, the power consumption increases by 8.1%, and the overall energy saving is 4.3%. The experimental results also show that the refrigeration system using R32 has a slightly higher energy efficiency ratio than R410A .
R410A refrigerant composition: R32, R125
Mole percentage: R32 accounts for 70%, R125 accounts for 30%
Mass percentage: R32 accounts for 50%, R125 accounts for 50%
UN NO:3163
CAS NO: 354-33-6,75-10-5
Refrigerant Freon Workshop and Shipment Glance
Many people ask, now that R410A is used well for air conditioners, why change to R32 or R290?
Isn't R410A also an environmentally friendly refrigerant?
In fact, although the ODP (ozone depletion potential) of R410A is 0, the GWP (global warming potential) is 2340, so strictly speaking, R410a is not a real environmentally friendly refrigerant.
Although R32 refrigerant is flammable and explosive, R32 does not destroy the ozone layer, and its GWP is only 30% of R410a. It has an atmospheric retention time of 5.6 years and a lower relative impulse. R290's ODP and GWP are almost zero, which is more environmentally friendly and energy-saving. In fact, to put it bluntly, R290 and R32 refrigerants are used because they are more environmentally friendly or energy-saving.
R410a Refrigerant Gas Introduction, Comparison of R410a and R32
| 11.3KG R410A | Certification：CE | ||||
| Cylinder | Height | Diameter | Thickness | |
| 420mm | 241mm | 1.5mm | |||
| Material | Capacity | Weight | |||
| DC04 | 13.3L | 3.5kg | |||
| Working Pressure | Testing Pressure | Filling Gas | |||
| 2.8Mpa | 3.45Mpa | R410A/R32 | |||
| Gas Purity | 99.91%-99.97% | ||||
| Gas N.W. | 11.3KG/25lb | ||||
| Packing | carton size 24.5*24.5*42.5cm | ||||
| Packing, Payment and Delivery | |||||
| Packing | 1 cylinder/carton, disposable cylinder, OEM design on carton | ||||
| Loading | 1150 cylinders/20ft container, mixing with other refrigerant gas is supported | ||||
| Payment | Normally By T/T 30% as deposit, and the 70% balance against copy of B/L | ||||
| Delivery | within 20 days after receipt of deposit and confirm of carton design | ||||
| |||||
Comparative analysis of the characteristics of R410A and R32.
1. Thermophysical properties: R32 charging volume can be reduced, only 0.71 times that of R410A. The working pressure of R32 system is higher than R410A, but the maximum increase is not more than 2.6%, which is equivalent to the pressure requirement of R410A system, and R32 system exhausts Compared with R410A, the temperature rises up to 35.3℃.
2. Environmental protection characteristics: ODP value (ozone depletion potential value) is 0, but R32's GWP value (global warming potential value) is moderate, compared with R22, the CO2 emission reduction ratio can reach 77.6%, while R410A is only 2.5% , It is significantly better than R410A in terms of CO2 emission reduction.
3. Safety: Both R32 and R410A are non-toxic, while R32 is combustible. Among several alternatives to R22, R32 and R290, R32 has the highest lower combustion limit, LFL. Although R290 is the most environmentally friendly, it is highly flammable and has a safety level of A3. Therefore, it is required to only charge air conditioners within 2p, and large number air conditioners are restricted.
4. Cycle performance: In terms of theoretical cycle performance, the cooling capacity of the R32 system is 12.6% higher than that of R410A, the power consumption increases by 8.1%, and the overall energy saving is 4.3%. The experimental results also show that the refrigeration system using R32 has a slightly higher energy efficiency ratio than R410A .
R410A refrigerant composition: R32, R125
Mole percentage: R32 accounts for 70%, R125 accounts for 30%
Mass percentage: R32 accounts for 50%, R125 accounts for 50%
UN NO:3163
CAS NO: 354-33-6,75-10-5
Refrigerant Freon Workshop and Shipment Glance
Many people ask, now that R410A is used well for air conditioners, why change to R32 or R290?
Isn't R410A also an environmentally friendly refrigerant?
In fact, although the ODP (ozone depletion potential) of R410A is 0, the GWP (global warming potential) is 2340, so strictly speaking, R410a is not a real environmentally friendly refrigerant.
Although R32 refrigerant is flammable and explosive, R32 does not destroy the ozone layer, and its GWP is only 30% of R410a. It has an atmospheric retention time of 5.6 years and a lower relative impulse. R290's ODP and GWP are almost zero, which is more environmentally friendly and energy-saving. In fact, to put it bluntly, R290 and R32 refrigerants are used because they are more environmentally friendly or energy-saving.
